![]() ![]() This two-track system will make the costs of punishment so trivial to society that you can go ahead and leave it out of any column discussing the pros and cons of fat legalization. Wealthy white fat people will apologize profusely for their fatness and then go to "fat rehab," ideally led by Jillian Michaels, multiple times if necessary. (Otherwise the policy wouldn't work!) Those who are jailed might find, upon release, that their records of criminal fatness make it harder for them to find work in their desired fields, such as national opinion columnist.īut we can mitigate the importance of this impact by mostly using fat jail for racial minorities and people with lower education levels. Of course, we'd have to actually jail some people for their fatness. It would lead to improved cardiovascular health, higher labor productivity (fewer sick days!), and longer life expectancy. Even independent of actual legal penalties, it would set a strong norm, showing that society is opposed to fatness and wants people to stay at healthy weights. A law against fat would scare people into losing weight. To some extent, it's a subjective matter who is lazy or stupid, but it's pretty easy to figure out who's guilty of being fat. (Brown didn't answer my Twitter question about whether she's ever smoked marijuana but, well, she works in publishing, so we can all hazard a guess.)īut why go after marijuana for its second-order effects? Why not just ban stupidity, laziness, obesity, unambitious taste, or whatever social ills are of concern to national opinion columnists? As Brooks asks, " Laws profoundly mold culture, so what sort of community do we want our laws to nurture?" If the answer is "one where people are thin," the obvious answer is to ban fatness.įat is an ideal menace to be targeted with a criminal law. Brooks says weed makes people unambitious and distracts them from " the highest pleasures, like enjoying the arts or being in nature." Brown is the most blunt, tweeting that " legal weed contributes to us being a fatter, dumber, sleepier nation even less able to compete with the Chinese."īrooks, Marcus, and Brown want to address these negative effects through a regime of criminal penalties that imprisons at least some subset of the people involved in cultivating, distributing and consuming the marijuana that Brooks and Marcus enjoyed so much in the 1970s. Really, they are worried about marijuana's negative second-order effects when other people smoke it. They both smoked quite a bit of it back in the day and still managed highly successful careers as national opinion columnists. It often indicates a user profile.īy Brooks' and Marcus' own admission, marijuana itself doesn't necessarily have such bad effects. If our heroes had adopted this concept early on, it would have prevented Dale from wandering out into an open field at night to have his guts ripped out by a walker who was there because dumbass Carl was wandering alone in the woods because no one is keeping track of each other.Account icon An icon in the shape of a person's head and shoulders. In the military, we have what is commonly referred to as the Buddy System. “Why are you wandering off by yourself during the apocalypse, moron?” As far as I’m concerned the Grimes gang deserved the ass whoopin’ they got. His group did just what I knew they would and waltzed into Negan territory murdering people without taking any time to observe them or come up with a long-term plan. Rick’s tribe of misfits has barely survived encounters with cannibals, tyrants, and predators of various stripes, yet suddenly Rick decided he’s the baddest man in the wasteland. ![]() At the end of last season, Rick, quite possibly the dumbest of the dumbasses, agreed to take on Negan with little to no intelligence on the guy. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |